Just when you thought it was ok to buy Heinz Ketchup again...
When Kerry conceded, he actually described his wife, using the words "grace, courage and candor." I guess he was just being nice.
For those of you that just crawl out from under a rock just to read my blog, Bush won!!!
This time, there is no doubt, he kicked ass. But, there is already conspiracies. The first one I heard is the weather control. Ok, if they technology did exist, how could that help him? Here is a clue about how the site leans:
4. Help to bring the US economy one step closer to its knees, and drive up the cost of food for everyone. These storms have caused damage in the billions to vegetable and orange crops - and in an economy with no real jobs being created.
How on earth could a bad economy help Bush? And the jobs. Ok, the job problem is not Bush's problem. Never has been and never will be. The fact is that presidents do not create jobs outside their own cabinet. Do you really want to know who is to blame for most of our job lose? Do you really want to know, cause you liberals are not gonna like it? Ok, here it goes.
Business A makes ... hmmm, pick your favorite sex toy...and we know you have one. They manufacture the product in OH, and thanks to unions, the average wage for the workers is $25.00 per hour. A decent wage. Then, because the company is loosing money, they go to the workers and ask for voluntary concessions to put the company in the black again. The union steps in and says NO. The workers deserve the wage and benefits and if you cut them, we will strike. The company backs down and looks for alternative ways to cut. While looking, they find that they can have the same product made in China or Indonesia or some other 3rd world country and they would only have to pay a fraction of the cost. So, since the company is in the business to make money, they pull up stakes and move the manufacturing part over seas and becomes an importer. Jobs are lost in OH because of Unions, not Bush. Maybe Bush is to blame for not doing something about the unions.
Notice that a tax break was not mentioned because that was not the primary reason for the move. The democrats would like us to believe that the only reason is the tax break, but nothing could be farther from the truth. And remember that the president that brought us NAFTA which makes all this possible, was Clinton, a democrat. Those jobs may have been saved if the unions had not pushed for so much. I mean, is it better to make $12.50 and have a job or $25.00 and not have a job.
Another is that EVoting machines are programmed to favor Bush. We all know the exit polls could not be wrong, because they favor Kerry. The truth is that the EVoting machines can and do create a paper trail. If they don't, why are we just now hearing about it after the election? Why would the democrats not insist on testing these machines beforehand? Could it be that they wanted some way to challenge the election if they lost? I mean it is not like the republicans cut tires or tried to use voting machines that already had 1500 votes on them BEFORE the poles opened like the democrat's did, or had restraining orders placed on them for making erroneous phone calls.
The bottom line is that the democrats have sunk to a new low. Never mind proof, just accuse and a lot of idiots will believe you. Ironically, the one democrat that did the right thing is...the candidate. Kerry did the right thing by not dragging this out. Everyone should agree that that would be very bad for the country. To quote Kerry, as I rarely do, "...in an American election, there are no losers, because whether or not our candidates are successful, the next morning we all wake up as Americans." Too bad that sentiment has to be cheapened by some of his followers that can't seem to let it go and realize that they lost.
For those of you that just crawl out from under a rock just to read my blog, Bush won!!!
This time, there is no doubt, he kicked ass. But, there is already conspiracies. The first one I heard is the weather control. Ok, if they technology did exist, how could that help him? Here is a clue about how the site leans:
4. Help to bring the US economy one step closer to its knees, and drive up the cost of food for everyone. These storms have caused damage in the billions to vegetable and orange crops - and in an economy with no real jobs being created.
How on earth could a bad economy help Bush? And the jobs. Ok, the job problem is not Bush's problem. Never has been and never will be. The fact is that presidents do not create jobs outside their own cabinet. Do you really want to know who is to blame for most of our job lose? Do you really want to know, cause you liberals are not gonna like it? Ok, here it goes.
Business A makes ... hmmm, pick your favorite sex toy...and we know you have one. They manufacture the product in OH, and thanks to unions, the average wage for the workers is $25.00 per hour. A decent wage. Then, because the company is loosing money, they go to the workers and ask for voluntary concessions to put the company in the black again. The union steps in and says NO. The workers deserve the wage and benefits and if you cut them, we will strike. The company backs down and looks for alternative ways to cut. While looking, they find that they can have the same product made in China or Indonesia or some other 3rd world country and they would only have to pay a fraction of the cost. So, since the company is in the business to make money, they pull up stakes and move the manufacturing part over seas and becomes an importer. Jobs are lost in OH because of Unions, not Bush. Maybe Bush is to blame for not doing something about the unions.
Notice that a tax break was not mentioned because that was not the primary reason for the move. The democrats would like us to believe that the only reason is the tax break, but nothing could be farther from the truth. And remember that the president that brought us NAFTA which makes all this possible, was Clinton, a democrat. Those jobs may have been saved if the unions had not pushed for so much. I mean, is it better to make $12.50 and have a job or $25.00 and not have a job.
Another is that EVoting machines are programmed to favor Bush. We all know the exit polls could not be wrong, because they favor Kerry. The truth is that the EVoting machines can and do create a paper trail. If they don't, why are we just now hearing about it after the election? Why would the democrats not insist on testing these machines beforehand? Could it be that they wanted some way to challenge the election if they lost? I mean it is not like the republicans cut tires or tried to use voting machines that already had 1500 votes on them BEFORE the poles opened like the democrat's did, or had restraining orders placed on them for making erroneous phone calls.
The bottom line is that the democrats have sunk to a new low. Never mind proof, just accuse and a lot of idiots will believe you. Ironically, the one democrat that did the right thing is...the candidate. Kerry did the right thing by not dragging this out. Everyone should agree that that would be very bad for the country. To quote Kerry, as I rarely do, "...in an American election, there are no losers, because whether or not our candidates are successful, the next morning we all wake up as Americans." Too bad that sentiment has to be cheapened by some of his followers that can't seem to let it go and realize that they lost.
posted by Randy Compton at 10:58 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home